Most PPC specialists and marketing agencies still create Google Ads reports manually in Excel or Google Sheets. It is a familiar, proven approach that gives full control over the document layout. But in 2026, is it still the best option?

Let's compare both approaches objectively — manual Excel reporting and automation — and see which one comes out ahead for an agency managing multiple Google Ads accounts.

Excel for PPC reporting — the advantages

Excel for PPC reporting — the drawbacks

Head-to-head: Excel vs automation

Criterion Excel (manual) Automation (AutoReports)
Time per report 2–3 hours < 1 minute
Risk of data errors High (manual export) Minimal (API)
Data freshness Data from export time Always current (real-time)
Visual consistency Depends on the specialist Identical across all clients
Scalability (10 clients) 20–30 h/month A few minutes
Template flexibility Unlimited Limited to available templates
Tool cost None (Excel already in-house) SaaS subscription

When automation is the clear winner

Example calculation: An agency with 8 Google Ads clients, monthly reporting. At 2.5 hours per report = 20 hours per month. At $100/h equivalent = $2,000 per month "wasted" on reporting mechanics. Automation reduces this to a few minutes — less than $100 equivalent cost.

When Excel still makes sense

Summary

Excel was the right tool for PPC reporting a decade ago. In 2026, with tools offering direct Google Ads API integration readily available, manual report creation is increasingly hard to justify economically — especially for agencies serving multiple clients.

Automation does not eliminate the need to analyse and comment on results — it eliminates the tedious work of copying and formatting data.

Try automated Google Ads reports

AutoReports replaces hours of manual work with a single click. PDF ready in under 1 minute.

Learn more →